I remember asking my sifu how he applied a certain technique so well. He said “feeling”. I asked him how he developed such good feeling. He smiled. “Practice.”
Good answer, but frustrating.
Training sometimes requires specificity — not just what to do, but specifically how to train to do it.
When a boxing coach tells a boxer to “Counter! Counter!”, what exactly is the boxer supposed to do in order to react in such a way that they a) don’t get hit, b) stay in position to counter, c) keep the timing to land a counter before the opponent can react.
When a grappling coach tells a grappler to “stay tight! stay tight!”, what specific sequence of movements and anatomical references is the grappler supposed to do to a) maintain weight and/or eliminate space/restrict movement, b) transition to a better position and/or setup an attack, c) establish the better position/finish the attack without allowing the opponent to escape (or otherwise regress the situation).
I use these as separate examples because Wing Chun, as some employ it, require both the boxer’s control of detached dynamics and the grapplers control of contact dynamics. We have to do specific things to achieve both.
So, in that why, specific measures/references and triggers can be helpful in learning application and analyzing problems during exchanges (sparring, chi sao, what have you).
Like with learning a new language (or any skill), in the beginning they may be over-obvious, stuttered, clumsy, part-remembered, or otherwise awkward, but with time and experience (and the elusive mastery we see but often seems so far off), the mechanics becomes all but invisible, the expression all but effortless; a distilled slang that hits all the necessary points in a hyper-efficient manner.
What do you think? Are you sometimes told what to do but not how to do it? Have you asked for help or figured out a way on your own? Is there any Wing Chun skill you’re looking for specific help in improving? Let us know!